The Art of Money Getting: Timeless Wealth Principles for Modern Australians

In 1880, the American showman P.T. Barnum published a lecture called The Art of Money Getting. It was equal parts moral sermon and practical handbook, full of homespun advice like "don't mistake your vocation," "avoid debt," and "persevere." More than 140 years later, the book is in the public domain, freely downloadable, and still quietly influential among personal-finance writers. The technology has changed. The temptations have multiplied. But the underlying principles have aged remarkably well.

That's the strange thing about wealth-building literature. The bestsellers of any given decade — from Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich to The Richest Man in Babylon to Morgan Housel's recent work — keep rediscovering the same handful of ideas. New books like The Art of Spending Money arrive each year reminding readers that, as one CNBC headline put it bluntly, "getting rich quickly won't cut it." The advice doesn't change because human psychology doesn't change.

For Australians watching property prices stretch beyond reach, crypto cycles boom and bust, and "finfluencers" flood TikTok with shortcuts, it's worth revisiting what the classics actually said — and why the message keeps needing to be repeated.

Principle one: time is the asset, not the shortcut

The dominant message of The Art of Spending Money, as discussed in a recent CNBC interview with the author, is that real wealth is the product of long-term effort. Get-rich-quick schemes, the argument goes, don't simply fail more often than they succeed — they actively undermine the patient compounding that builds genuine financial security.

This isn't a new idea. Barnum warned against speculation in the 1880s. Benjamin Graham distinguished investing from speculating in the 1930s. The Bogleheads have hammered the point since the 1970s. And yet every generation has to learn it again, because every generation gets a new flavour of fast money — railway shares, dotcoms, day-trading apps, meme stocks, crypto.

For Australian readers, the practical implication is unglamorous. Compulsory superannuation, started in 1992, is arguably the single most powerful wealth-building tool most Australians will ever touch — precisely because it forces the long-term behaviour the classics recommend. The boring strategy of salary-sacrificing a few extra percent, choosing a low-fee fund, and ignoring it for three decades will out-perform almost any clever scheme dreamed up at a barbecue.

Principle two: the hook matters — but so does what's behind it

Money-getting has always involved a degree of persuasion. Barnum himself was, after all, a showman. A recent Big Think profile of British entrepreneur Simon Squibb examined what it called "the art of the hook" — how a modern business builder uses attention, story and influence to redirect capital and opportunity toward ideas.

The lesson cuts both ways. If you're building a business, a personal brand, or even just negotiating a pay rise, you cannot rely on the work speaking for itself. Visibility is part of the craft. But the same logic explains why so many consumers lose money: they respond to hooks designed by people far better at marketing than they are at investing. Every "financial freedom" course advertised on Instagram is using the art of the hook on you.

The classical writers understood this tension. Barnum loved a hook — he invented some of the most famous in history — but he also insisted that long-term reputation, what he called "the importance of character," was the only foundation on which real wealth could rest. A hook gets the first sale. Character gets the next twenty years of them.

Principle three: spending is a skill, not an afterthought

One of the more interesting shifts in recent personal-finance writing is the recognition that spending deserves as much attention as earning or investing. The very title of The Art of Spending Money signals it. Most older books focus on accumulation: how to earn more, save more, invest more. The modern complement is to ask what the money is actually for.

This matters because the wealthiest-looking person on your street is often the most financially fragile. Cars on novated leases, renovations on redraw facilities, holidays on Afterpay — Australia has industrialised the conversion of future income into present consumption. The classical principle of "living within your means" hasn't been repealed; it's just been buried under an avalanche of payment options.

A useful exercise drawn from the classics: separate spending into three buckets.

You don't need a spreadsheet to do this. You need ten minutes and honesty.

Principle four: the boring fundamentals still win

If you compressed every classic money book onto a single index card, it would read something like this:

That's it. That's the secret. The reason the publishing industry can still sell new wealth books every year isn't that the principles have changed — it's that following them is psychologically hard. We're wired for short-term reward, social comparison, and pattern-seeking. Markets are designed to exploit all three.

This is also why the "get rich quick won't cut it" warning keeps appearing in headlines. It's not a fresh insight. It's a recurring intervention against a recurring temptation.

What's actually different in 2024

To be fair to modernity, a few things have genuinely changed since Barnum's day, and they're worth naming.

First, access. An ordinary Australian today can buy a globally diversified index portfolio in five minutes for a few dollars in fees. Barnum's contemporaries could not. This is a structural advantage that earlier generations would have killed for, and most of us underuse it.

Second, information asymmetry has flipped — and then flipped back. We have more financial information than ever, but also more financial misinformation. The skill of curating trustworthy sources has become part of money management itself.

Third, the attention economy means that the "art of the hook" Squibb describes is now weaponised at industrial scale. Every app on your phone is, in some sense, competing for the dollars that the classics would have told you to save.

The quiet conclusion

The art of money getting, stripped of its 19th-century language, turns out to be mostly the art of not doing things — not chasing the hot tip, not buying the status symbol, not panicking in a downturn, not believing the influencer who promises a shortcut. The active parts (earn well, invest steadily, insure sensibly) are simple enough to fit on a napkin.

What endures across every generation of finance writing is a single uncomfortable truth: wealth is built by people who behave consistently over very long periods. The headlines change. The asset classes change. The technology changes. The discipline doesn't. Barnum knew it. The author of The Art of Spending Money knows it. And if you're reading this in Sydney or Shepparton in 2024, you already know it too. The only question is whether you'll act on it before the next hook comes along.

Related on Bleen

Sources